A / 相比《快乐的保姆》真的“臃肿”很多但并不显杂乱的最主要原因大概还是:以尽可能灵活的方式调用第三人称并不断变换叙述的语气镜头在人物的目光传递中滑移分叉的线条形成狎昵挑逗的伪饰感;又在情节突转的时刻无比精确地定格人物的目光(比如面对死者的那一刻、比如海报上那一刻)叙述语气形成瞬间的真空从而让情感无声喷薄假如说前者包裹了一种欣欣然立基于“日常生活”的自由主义女性叙事后者则在历史的暗面让这片仿佛指向觉醒的领土瓦解最终呈现的与其说是性别二元前提下家国同构之类的粗糙结论不如说是对“声名狼藉者的生活”及其中权力运作方式的隐微勾勒
诗酒:171.9.232.189
The very first modern western movie, and the model for all of those to come. The elements of narration and filmography that it sets hold steady until now and probably for still a long time - see Tarantino's hateful eight for their confirmation. Most of the ideas on it are simple, but it takes a master to put the ingredients all in place and to cook something this delicious. Without any obvious main character, but rather a complex mix of persona, each cristallizing a class or a segment of society. This a Western movie to be sure, with all the parts that make up the mechanics, but it is above all a satire. One that is politically engaged too, especially in regards to the banker role.